Karma for Trump Supporters

@ThePuddyTat You mean into the Petri dish containing her thawed eggs?

@ThePuddyTat Guess it'll be Mamdani splooging into the Petri dish then.

@ilbbaicnl Mamdani has a wife that the liberal media keeps trying to convince us is hot (just like Harris' weird ass stepdaughter).

I bet some of the Lib Cope Squad here are jacking their little wenises over the thought of getting with AOC. If I wanted to nail a screeching liberal I'd choose Jasmine Crockett first. She seems like the type who's into anal.

@ThePuddyTat Now we know why Tweety Bird avoided you, wanted to keep the back door closed.

@ThePuddyTat are you sure you're not gay?

@ilbbaicnl Gross. She looks trans.

@ilbbaicnl Anal sex is overrated, but I wouldn't risk conceiving a demon child with her.

@ThePuddyTat This is why you have to stop wanking to Mar-A-Lago Face. You've lost all concept of what an attractive young woman naturally looks like.

@ilbbaicnl Don't worry, even though MAGA has characteristics of a demon cult, that doesn't mean you have demon genes.

@ilbbaicnl Weak troll game. Work on it.

@ThePuddyTat Alas, I know I'm incapable of achieving the level of troll-dom of MAGA idols.

@ilbbaicnl Bless your heart, you sure try.

Conservative women are considerably less likely to have dicks or bizarre pronouns, to generalize and hate all men, or have gotten balled by the local NBA team.

@ThePuddyTat newsweek.com

@ilbbaicnl In other words, more than half do. 73% of Americans want them only on birth gender sports teams. Most also don't want to be forced to use someone's "neopronouns" or lose their jobs. There's a growing rift between the LGB and the TQ. The former don't try to rub our noses in their kinks.

@ThePuddyTat What's the pronoun for someone born a hermaphrodyte? If someone wants to call you "she" at work, are you required to pull your pants down in front of an all hands meeting to prove they shouldn't?

Good enough for me if you as an anonymous internet rando say it's just a kink, who cares what Science has to say about it?

@ilbbaicnl Are you seriously comparing sports with a physical difference to the corporate realm?

Read the "science" behind separating "sex" from "gender." It was a failure, they tried to raise a male who inadvertently had his penis chopped off in a botched circumcision as a female, and it caused him so much stress he committed suicide. But like a good gender ideologue, it didn't stop them. We need a return to kinkshaming and not affirming people's delusions. Do we tell anorexics "you really are fat, let's get you in for a lap band"?

Like most libs, you're so eager to signal your virtue that you shut your tiny little brain off. Stop being retarded.

@ThePuddyTat OK so somebody at work thinks they're a woman, but you think they aren't, so that's oppressing you if your employer want you to call them she. Suppose somebody at work decides (with some justification) that wankernazi is the best name for you. Are they oppressed if your employer tells them not to call you wankernazi, because it's still not polite even though it's true?

It's just how it works, if you accept it's OK for society to be a little totalitarian, tell people who they are instead of letting them decide who they are, that risks society becoming a lot totalitarian. Unless what they decide impinges on the rights of others. Are you really such a snowflake cunt, that you're going to claim having to call someone one pronoun versus another impinges on your rights?

@ilbbaicnl One is the objective truth, one is just your idiotic opinion. You're clearly retarded.

@ThePuddyTat Your confident assertion that something that goes against what the majority of psychologists have concluded is objective truth shows that you are a blithering idiot (as well as a wankernazi).

@ilbbaicnl You clearly don't know the history or the science behind it. Not to mention I told you I don't identify as a "wankernazi" and you still call me such, you bigot. Go back to posting furry porn, it's more your speed.

@ThePuddyTat That's based on you accepting what MAGA vomits into your empty skull as history and science. I am parodying your bigotry knucklehead.

@ilbbaicnl MAGA MAGA MAGA, I don't think you know what that means. I only voted for Trump once, and that was more a reaction against a left gone utterly mad.

You're neither creative, nor original, nor witty. Stick to jacking your dicklet to furry porn. I do kinkshame.

@ThePuddyTat MAGA has many strains, one of its similarities to a virulent disease. Typical of a deceptive product, it needs frequent rebranding. MAGA, The Klan, America First, The Tea Party, The Know Nothings are all basically interchangeable in that they have the same malignancy. Demonizing groups of people simply for wanting things that we expect can be taken for granted in the US.

@ilbbaicnl Lazy "analysis." Let the adults discuss politics. Stick to your furry porn, because a woman you aren't paying won't touch you.

@ThePuddyTat It doesn't take much work to analyze the political beliefs of stupid, malignant people. You somehow think if you mindlessly declare your superiority over and over again, it becomes fact. Faithful to Goebbels, at least.

@ilbbaicnl And you can't even muster that. Anyone who has paid any attention could tell the difference between the Tea Party, MAGA, and America First. No one is demonizing anyone who isn't breaking the law and wants to actually contribute to the country rather than mooch off of it, or use it to arbitrate old country disputes.

Stick to your AI porn, because you can't get any cooch without paying for it.

@ThePuddyTat How is wanting to play on a sports team in high school, or to be called by a different pronoun, breaking the law? Why do border jumpers deserve to be demonized more than speeders, when only the later risks damage/injury to others? What is your not-fake evidence that most border jumpers or transgender people mooch of the country or don't contribute to it? From what fresh Truth Social Hell-spew did you get "arbitrate old country disputes" from?

@ilbbaicnl You can play on a sports team, of your actual sex. No one has a duty to risk injury to their daughters so a mentally-ill boy can dominate them. Just because it might not be "against the law" doesn't mean we have to allow it. Heck, I don't care if adults want to mutilate themselves, but once they try to make "deadnaming" a crime, it forces behavior on the rest of us.

Border jumpers are committing a crime by definition, straining social services, killing, raping, stealing, DUiing, and the left defends them.

Why is Israel a fixation for the left? It's not in my top 10 list of issues, nor most other Americans. It's an old country fixation for Muslims and their anti-civilization socialist anus lickers on the left.

Heck, why is the left fixated on forcing their gender ideology, which was considered batshit until ten or so years ago, on everyone else? It's because without something to divide Americans, the activists lose their source of cash. They're mostly playing rich white women, selling indulgences like the medieval church.

Again, stick to your furry porn. Liberal men are low T and have mental disorders, so actual women don't want to fuck them. Real porn might get your hopes up.

@ThePuddyTat OK, thank you for clarifying that you just don't do non-fake. Here's a little furry porn as a peace offering.

@ThePuddyTat Do you think it's OK for school districts to ban any teaching about Islam? Because of feedback from parents who think Islam is so bad, they don't want their kids to know it exists?

@ilbbaicnl No, they should know the full history of the world. Including how Islam was spread and how they hang gays from cranes and beat women to death for showing their necklines.

@ThePuddyTat So you're good with the "Heather Has Two Mommies" book, since kids at the school might have two mommies? Or did Tucker Carlson say it has a whole chapter on double-headed dildos, and he never lies?

@ThePuddyTat Should the teacher tell Jimmy not to stick his tongue out at Abdul, cause Abdul will hang him from a crane?

@ilbbaicnl I don't care what Carlson thinks but yeah I don't want graphic depictions of man/boy sex in school libraries. I know it makes it a banned book but I don't care. If you wouldn't take a kid to a strip club, don't show them any depictions of sex.

Tell Jimmy that Abdul's government does. Or do you want to whitewash history?

@ThePuddyTat So you saw it on Truth Social that Heather Has Two Mommies has man/boy sex in it?

How exactly is it that Jimmy and Abdul go to the same school, but have different governments? Or what am I missing?

Should Jimmy learn how the Crusaders thought it was OK to murder and rape people if they did it while crusading? Or about the Christians who think Jewish illegal immigration into Palestine was OK, because they hope it will lead to The Rapture happening?

@ilbbaicnl You're quite slow on the uptake today. Heather has two mommies, I could care less. The LGB are splitting from the TQ whom they have regarded as gonna off the deep end. And yes, they're pushing for books with explicit sex. If you wouldn't take kids to a strip club because it's inappropriate, don't take them to a drag show.

I guess my comment about whitewashing history went over your head. Did Abdul come from a place where they do that? Or are you that obtuse in your interpretation?

If you want to teach the ugly parts of history you have to teach all of it. Not some critical theory narrative that the west was uniquely bad. But that's the lodestar of the left these days, west bad, America bad, third world good. Shit, the DSA is starting to praise Putin, that's how far gone they were.

There are a percent of a percent of Christians who want to speed up the Rapture. Get off the internet, put the hand lotion and furry porn away, and meet people. You might find a civvie who actually wants to fuck you. Long odds but you miss the shots you don't take.

@ThePuddyTat "A 2017 LifeWay poll conducted in United States found that 80% of evangelical Christians believed that the creation of Israel in 1948 was a fulfillment of biblical prophecy that would bring about Christ's return and more than 50% of Evangelical Christians believed that they support Israel because it is important for fulfilling the prophecy."

@ThePuddyTat The last time that Christianity was used to justify full authoritarian rule is not very far in the past: en.wikipedia.org

How about how Trump portrays himself as Jesus while making every effort to rule by decree?

How has democracy in Britain been able to survive having a Muslim Home Secretary? en.wikipedia.org

My questions are likely to be once again effectively rhetorical. You will duck them in a very low-T way. You'll just continue to demonize entire groups of people, based on behavior of at most a minority of each demonized group.

@ilbbaicnl Big difference between supporting Israel and trying to speed it up. But I guess that's lost on you.

@ilbbaicnl Who is using Christianity to justify authoritarian rule today? You didn't read a few lines down into your own reference where, after declaring Catholicism the state religion, Mussolini actively persecuted the Catholic church.

You can't tell the difference between you being trolled and authoritarianism? "Rule by decree" has been every president in the last half century as a layabout Congress has abdicated its authority to the other two branches. Freedom of speech is much stronger under Trump than Biden. Ironically, Trump's greatest assaults on freedom look to be those from listening to Fauci and the COVID lockdowns which got worse under Biden.

The UK imprisons more people for social media posts than Russia or China. Freedom of speech hangs by a thread. Not the greatest example. There are huge differences between the way the law is enforced against different groups. Not the best example.

Pattern recognition isn't demonization. There's no one to virtue signal to here.

@ThePuddyTat you're the only one who's mentioned speeding it up. More arguing with yourself, time for a palm shave?

@ThePuddyTat The Iranian government also persecutes other Muslims. So why doesn't that also make you see that, in both cases, religion is a smokescreen for the behavior, not a cause. The behavior being what lies at the end of the road of self-aggrandizing demonization of others.

It's true Trump did not invent the Imperial Presidency. But he is trying to make it worse by orders of magnitude. What other President has tried to alter a clause in the Constitution by executive order? Why is he practicing impoundment, when the courts banned it in the time of NIxon?

Do you have any references for your claims about the UK?

@ilbbaicnl Who does the Iranian government persecute more? Sunni Muslims, or gays and women? Pretending Islam has nothing to do with it doesn't make you enlightened, just dense.

Every president has pushed the boundaries of the Constitution. Saying Trump is especially bad just shows you're a mindless partisan. FDR depriving Japanese-Americans of liberties and running a 3rd and 4th term was pretty bad. The Alien and Sedition Acts in the early days. Every Democrat's assault on the 2nd amendment. Biden jawboning (legal term) social media platforms and highly differential prosecutions of the left and right. Get some perspective, man.

Here's one reference for my claims about the UK, and it's gotten much worse since 2023. x.com

As a bonus, I'll give you from the UK's own website, the report on grooming gangs. Hint: these weren't Britons or Celts gov.uk

"And we will commission new research into the cultural and social drivers of child sexual exploitation, misogyny and violence against women and girls, as Baroness Casey has recommended."

@ThePuddyTat The Iranian (and Saudi) government's interpretation of Islam has much to do with their evil actions. Just as Hegseth's interpretation of Christianity has much to do with him ordering the murder of people in boats, based on suspicion at best. Netanyahu's interpretation of Judaism is that one can take the whole head, rather than just an eye for an eye. Some Christians interpret Christianity in a way that supports him in doing so. But, since I prefer good over evil, do not use such things to blame a whole group of people for what they individually do not do or support.

I agree that FDR interning Japanese-Americans was an instance of unconstitutional Presidential action. Although SCOTUS, in a 6-3 decision, did think it was constitutional. When FDR was elected to more than 2 terms, that wasn't yet unconstitutional. Acts of Congress are not relevant to the issue of unconstitutional executive action. Reasonable people can disagree on what rights to individual gun ownership the 2nd Amendment establishes. Although it's problematic, it's currently legal for social media sites to censor as they wish. They rely heavily on complaints from third parties in deciding what to censor. It's reasonable to be concerned when the third party is the government, but it's not a solid case for jawboning. A solid case would require instances where sites were sanctioned for not censoring what the government wanted censored. If the government simply makes a site aware it's spreading lies, and the the site doesn't want to spread those lies, how is that bad? Merrick Garland's decision to wait till after the Jan 6 Committee hearings to criminally prosecute Trump was an big lucky break for Trump. Unlike the Biden DOJ, the Trump DOJ has had multiple cases against political opponents summarily dismissed by courts.

Threatening people is not protected speech. It's highly questionable how bad US LE is at finding and prosecuting people who communicate threats. It's not clear if the high UK numbers reflect doing a better job than the US does. Consider the two statement "in three weeks, start killing all latte drinkers" and "it would be good if, in three weeks, people started killing latte drinkers". The US is much more likely than any other place with English Common Law rights to see the second statement, versus the first, as protected speech. But reasonable people could disagree about whether that's for the best.

I'll just say it again in a different way: it violates the basic rules of logic to say that if some people in a group do something, all the people in that group are responsible for the action. Since the Tate brothers are not Muslims, pimping is clearly not a problem particular to Muslims.

@ilbbaicnl Whose holy book commands one to kill infidels in the modern day? The Old Testament has enough instances of Jews eliminating tribes, but it's within the context of history, not a modern day commandment. If anyone believes that Christians and Jews have the right to kill infidels, they're a tiny, unsupported minority. Not every Muslim has to want to kill or oppress unbelievers to say that it's a problem, though you seem to like generalizing Republicans. How you get from Hegseth to generalizing all Christians has me asking what you've been smoking. You are uniquely giving Islam a pass when it's by far more oppressive to infidels than the others.

Again, you have a huge double standard on what is "Constitutional" for one party than the other. Was FDR racist? You have no problem calling Trump that when he hasn't interned anyone on the basis of race (breaking immigration law is different).

Reasonable people can disagree on the second amendment, but good luck getting most Democrats to agree there's an individual right to own guns. If they were to acknowledge this in the context of the "militia" as understood, I would call them reasonable. But they are not.

Social media can censor, but political officials cannot intimidate them into censorship. Legal scholars agree that this was intimidation. Similarly, what are "lies" is not straightforward, look at the misinformation around COVID.

The UK is censoring a lot more than threats. Look up the Graham Linehan case, if you hurt the feelings of a protected group, you're in trouble. In Manchester, a Brit who legally purchased a baseball bat was arrested outside the store by cops. Meanwhile, Muslims are waving knives openly and getting away with it. The UK has effectively a two-tier system that is privileging people who want to fundamentally rewrite the rules of their society.

Again, not every person in a group needs to be violent, to say that the group on the whole is violent. I'm not aware of any Christian or Jewish suicide bombers. Why do you give Islam a pass? You're incredibly biased and patting yourself on the back for being "tolerant."

@ThePuddyTat When Jews were expelled from Spain and other Christian countries, why did they seek and find refuge in the Ottoman Empire? I specifically said no generalizations should be made, from Hegseth or anybody.

Yes both FDR and Trump are more racist than a President should be. FDR may be more racist than Trump. Democrat office holders clearly have a level of contempt for black voters as a group. The only thing that makes it less racist is their displays of contempt for many white voters as well.

Only about half of Democrats want a ban on handguns: news.gallup.com . And people generally see less danger in non-concealable guns.

I haven't seen concrete evidence of intimidation.

Graham Linehan told people on X to punch transgender people. I don't know why he didn't get convicted of inciting to violence.

Me personally, I think its the death or injury of the victims that makes terrorism bad. Not perpetrators dying. en.wikipedia.org

@ilbbaicnl You cannot seriously be countering a modern day example with 700 years ago. If you don't recognize patterns, your brain is asleep.

Again, moral equivalence eats a bag of dicks. There's no comparison of what FDR did and what Trump does.

Half of Democrats wanting a ban is half too many. Biden spent his term pushing the boundaries of six amendments (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10) of the Bill of Rights.

If you haven't seen concrete evidence, you haven't looked.

Graham Linehan got 25,000 quid and an apology for that "incitement." Muslims in Great Britain wave signs saying "MASSACRE THOSE WHO DISRESPECT ISLAM" and "HANG THOSE WHO INSULT THE PROPHET" with impunity. Double standard much?

Great, you've got one Wikipedia article on Christian terrorism and one recent example. I'll raise you 9/11 and 10/7, and 200,000 deaths from 2013-2024. en.wikipedia.org Multiple orders of magnitude difference. Have I mentioned moral equivalence sucks yet?

Again, I'm not saying every Muslim is a terrorist. But that's a lazy ass dodge. Not every Christian is a terrorist, and in fact, a Christian, Jew, Buddhist, Shinto, Hindu, Confucian, or Taoist is far, far, far less likely to be a terrorist than a Muslim.

Why is that?

@ThePuddyTat But you said Muslims are terrorists because they are commanded to be terrorists by the Quran. Then you say evidence they were relatively less terrorist 700 years ago is irrelevant. But the Quran is more than 1,000 year old. The math doesn't work.

Illegal immigrants were lured to the US with the opportunity for a better life. Our government only interfered with them in a token way for plausible deniability. That it was intentionally creating an underpaid, exploitable class of workers. Now Trump is taking a page out of your playbook, demonizing them for simply wanting what people living and working in the US should be able to take for granted. To justify plucking them out of society. Permanently, rather than temporarily as the Japanese-Americans were. In both causes, the immoral policy is nominally legal.

Since you're clearly facts-challenged, it's a fool's errand for me to spend time looking for evidence you say is easy to find, buy you can't be bothered to link to or otherwise locate.

Anyone inciting massacres and hangings should be prosecuted for it. All you seem to be presenting is evidence that Britain is doing a bad job all around in prosecuting those who incite violence.

Interesting Wikipedia article you linked to. Did you catch this paragraph?

"The book The Revolt by Menachem Begin, leader of the Irgun militia and future Israeli Prime Minister, influenced both Carlos Marighella's urban guerrilla theory and Osama bin Laden's Islamist al-Qaeda organization. Israeli journalist Ronen Bergman in the book Rise and Kill First asserted that Hezbollah's 1983 campaign of coordinated terrorist attacks against American, French and Israeli military installations in Beirut drew inspiration from and directly mirrored the Haganah's and Irgun's 1946 bombing campaign against the British: both succeeded in creating an atmosphere of widespread fear which eventually forced the enemy to withdraw. Bergman further asserts that the influence of Israeli-sponsored terrorist operations on the emerging Islamists was also of operational nature: the Israeli proxy Front for the Liberation of Lebanon from Foreigners had carried out multiple deadly truck bombings in Lebanon long before the emergence of Hezbollah. An Israeli Mossad agent told Bergman: "I saw from a distance one of the cars blowing up and demolishing an entire street. We were teaching the Lebanese how effective a car bomb could be. Everything that we saw later with Hezbollah sprang from what they saw had happened after these operations.""

Pete Hegseth disagrees with you, that terrorist violence with claims of justification in Christianity is a thing of the past: "He praises the Crusades, which he says began when in "the eleventh century, Christianity in the Mediterranean region, including the holy sites in Jerusalem, was so besieged by Islam that Christians had a stark choice: to wage defensive war or continue to allow Islam's expansion and face existential war at home in Europe". He says the "pope, the Catholic Church, and European Christians chose to fight – and the crusades were born. Pope Urban II urged the faithful to fight the Muslims with his famous battle cry on their lips: 'Deus vult!,' or 'God wills it!'" He continues by saying "Enjoy Western civilization? Freedom? Equal justice under the law? Thank a crusader"" en.wikipedia.org

Why is there a lot of terrorist violence claiming justification in Islam? Because Hegseth's counterparts in Islamic countries with major oil revenues got access to the big money flows, and used the money to fund violence. If Trump's failures don't stop Hegseth's ilk, your weak claims that terrorism with a Christian facade is so 5 minutes ago will be even weaker.

The 200,000 number is based on counting deaths in countries with insurgencies and civil wars going on: en.wikipedia.org . Seems questionable. US air-dropped bombs and other stand-off munitions killed many civilians, well-documented in Gaza and Vietnam, possibly also in Iraq and Afghanistan. Seems arbitrary, in a combat situation, that only a bomb planted by hand counts as terrorism.

@ilbbaicnl Read the Quran and see all the verses justifying it. Read about the "Mecca" and "Medina" verses i.e. the commands given when Muslims are weak vs when they have power. It's peace and love when they're weak, it's kill the infidel when they have power. But again, look at what is used to justify what these days.

Illegals are not "lured" here. They make a conscious decision. 90+% lied about their asylum claims. If they're an exploitable underclass, then getting rid of that is a good thing, isn't it? In the end, there is no intrinsic right to be an American. Borders mean things, they define a nation, even if the bleeding hearts (and bleeding brains) on the left can't admit it.

I'm pointing out who is really inciting violence in Britain. You're interested in the molehill and ignoring the mountain.

In fact, that's a constant in your writing. Looking at antiquity vs today to draw a false equivalence. Crusades? That was the motivation, as Islam was being spread by the sword. The Crusaders weren't nice people about it, but nor were the Muslims forcing Middle Eastern Christians to convert. In the end, they were right. Islam did force itself into Europe, al-Andalus, Southeastern Europe, until warriors like Charles Martel stopped them. Now, the Muslim Brotherhood, in some fucked up Islamist version of the Brezhnev Doctrine, claim any land once held by Muslims must be forcibly converted to Islam. Show me anything comparable in Christianity or Judaism or Buddhism or Hinduism or Shintoism or Paganism or anything. Show me a verse in any other holy book that does this.

On terrorist deaths, you're flailing to attribute Muslim terrorist deaths to any cause other than Muslim terrorism. Again, there is no comparison, the difference is orders of magnitude.

Oh, and per something you said above, giving men testosterone is actually shown to make them more conservative. Leftism is the low T ideology.

@ThePuddyTat Forgive me if doubt your expertise in accurately interpreting the Quran. And no, it doesn't prove you're right, if I have other things to do besides become an expert in the Quran myself. In any case, even experts in the Quran, as with the Bible, disagree about how to resolve its apparent self-contradictions. This is why, for rank-and-file believers, both Christianity and Islam have CliffsNotes for the core beliefs. For Christianity, it's the 10 Commandments, plus Jesus's 11th, plus (for some) the Nicene Creed. For Muslims, it's the Pillars ( en.wikipedia.org ). Spoiler: being a terrorist is not one of the pillars.

Reagan was the last President to try to stop the Jim Crow Lite policy of tolerating illegal immigration. But he also realized you can't demonize someone for grabbing the brass ring when it's dangled before them. So amnesty was the cornerstone of his attempt to fix the situation. But later Presidents and Congresses, in a bipartisan way, quietly frustrated his fix. Few things are more obvious IMO, so I'll just have to agree to disagree if you dispute this. Even Trump has failed to put in the place the robust measures that would make it largely impossible for illegal immigrants to work when their employment is reported to the government (and it typically is). Because the main purpose of ICE is not immigration. It's primarily a proto-gestapo. ICE uses any pretext to kill, assault, detain, or harass US citizens and others legally in the US.

I don't follow the news in Britain, so I couldn't say if, out of misplaced wokeness, the government tolerates menacing with a facade of Islam. But that's a different issue, from whether Islam must be condemned because even mainstream Muslim belief puts one at risk of becoming a terrorist. The fact that you can't argue your point without conflating it should tell you that you are emoting more than thinking.

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

I don't challenge your claim that "conservatives" of your ilk are highly hormonal.

@ilbbaicnl “Forgive me if doubt your expertise in accurately interpreting the Quran. And no, it doesn't prove you're right, if I have other things to do besides become an expert in the Quran myself.”

Cool, stay ignorant.

“In any case, even experts in the Quran, as with the Bible, disagree about how to resolve its apparent self-contradictions.”

Again, which one are people killing in the name of, these days? You’re trying to muddy the waters, but I can keep coming back to that simple fact. Would you rather be a Muslim in Israel or a Jew in any Muslim country? If you heard someone walk into a strip club or restaurant where you were enjoying yourself yelling “Jesus is Lord,” “Baruch Hashem,” or “Allahu Akbar,” which would make you hit the fucking deck? Which has a longer life expectancy, standing in the Vatican with a sign that says “Fuck Jesus” or standing in Mecca with a sign that says “Fuck Muhammad”? (Actually, you wouldn’t be able to get into Mecca if you’re not Muslim, but substitute any Muslim city for that). You know the answer to each of those. It’s why you have to reach a thousand years in the past to compare tolerance in the Muslim world to tolerance in the Judeo-Christian world today.

“Reagan was the last President to try to stop the Jim Crow Lite policy of tolerating illegal immigration.”

Back when Bernie Sanders was honest, he called out illegal immigration as a Chamber of Commerce proposal to stifle the American worker’s wages. But Democrats decided importing illegals and ignoring illegal voting was more important. They fucked the American worker in the ass. It’s also why the greatest predictor of DSA membership is a post-grad education and a salary under $60,000. Look at every primary, whom the working class actually votes for.”

“But he also realized you can't demonize someone for grabbing the brass ring when it's dangled before them.”

Completely dumbass argument, tantamount to the “she was asking to be raped dressing like that.” So if someone wears a fancy watch, we shouldn’t demonize a robber for sticking them up? Or should we make bank robbery legal because all the money shorts out their rational mind.

“Even Trump has failed to put in the place the robust measures that would make it largely impossible for illegal immigrants to work when their employment is reported to the government (and it typically is).”

No argument there. I’d mandate e-Verify and go after employers with criminal penalties. And tell every country of origin that if they don’t accept their citizens back, we’re going to tax all remittances at 100%.

“Because the main purpose of ICE is not immigration. It's primarily a proto-gestapo. ICE uses any pretext to kill, assault, detain, or harass US citizens and others legally in the US.”

Inflammatory comment without factual basis.

“I don't follow the news in Britain, so I couldn't say if, out of misplaced wokeness, the government tolerates menacing with a facade of Islam.”

If you don’t follow the news, kindly don’t opine on it. The double standards, the rape gangs, the welcoming of immigrants that openly despise them just to show how righteous they are, paints a very coherent picture.

“But that's a different issue, from whether Islam must be condemned because even mainstream Muslim belief puts one at risk of becoming a terrorist.”

That’s your critical misunderstanding. It’s not about whether Islam must be condemned (I “condemn” it because I don’t practice it, alongside many other religions), it’s about whether it’s rational to be suspicious of its practitioners. See those questions I posed at the top. You know the answer.

I do regular community service alongside upstanding Muslims. I don’t quiz them about their beliefs but they themselves are welcoming, and we’re doing good things for everyone. People who do community service, I’d imagine, are decidedly less likely to be terrorists. But again, who is more likely to kill American civilians?

“I don't challenge your claim that "conservatives" of your ilk are highly hormonal.”

You said I would duck questions in a “very low-T” way. I showed whose ideology is “hormonal.” The 2026 left is highly, highly feminized.

@ThePuddyTat Your justification for being suspicious of all Muslims is similar to the justification some use to be suspicious of black men. The percentage of known violent criminals who are black men is much bigger than the percentage of the population that are black men. In spite of the fact that the vast majority of black men are not violent criminals.

At this point in time, nominally Christian and Jewish countries are more tolerant than Muslim-majority countries. I don't think one can assume that Islam is the primary cause for the intolerance. People in Israel and nominally Christian countries are generally less devout. They are wealthier, and thus better educated than people in Muslim countries. Not unrelated to the fact that it was ultimately Christian countries who managed to exert imperial rule over Muslim lands, and not vice-versa. The fact that all Jewish and Christian prophets after Moses eschewed political power may have helped encourage tolerance. But I'd reserve my suspicion for those who align with more specific groups. Examples: Al Qaeda, ISIS, the governments of the Persian Gulf states, Christian Nationalists, the KKK, Jews who support ethnic cleansing.

If illegal immigration is all on the Democrats, what did Bush Jr. do to stop it?

The better analogy is, you go in the bank and say "I'd like to rob this bank if that's OK, no pressure". And the teller says "sure!" with a big smile and hands you a bag of money. And, if the police catch you, they just make you give back the money, and tell you "better luck next time bro!".

I pointedly didn't opine on it. But whatever, it's clear your main goal here is just to feed your spite.

Good character and qualities are the same regardless of gender. Only people lacking in good character and qualities don't understand that.

@ilbbaicnl “Your justification for being suspicious of all Muslims is similar to the justification some use to be suspicious of black men. The percentage of known violent criminals who are black men is much bigger than the percentage of the population that are black men. In spite of the fact that the vast majority of black men are not violent criminals.” ---““There is nothing more painful to me at this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps... then turn around and see somebody white and feel relieved.” – Jesse Jackson. Is he a racist? I’m not suspicious of all Muslims or all black men, but it’s part of a picture, and yes, it’s pattern recognition to be more suspicious of them. If you saw a bunch of men in white hoods standing in a circle in the back yard, I’d steer way fucking clear of them. There are other risk factors I take in mind—men 15-40 are a lot more likely to be trouble than old women, kids sitting on the stoop in the middle of the day. Sounds like you do it too.

“At this point in time, nominally Christian and Jewish countries are more tolerant than Muslim-majority countries.” ---This is the only point in time that we’re living in. I don’t give a rat’s ass about a thousand years ago.

“I don't think one can assume that Islam is the primary cause for the intolerance. People in Israel and nominally Christian countries are generally less devout. They are wealthier, and thus better educated than people in Muslim countries. Not unrelated to the fact that it was ultimately Christian countries who managed to exert imperial rule over Muslim lands, and not vice-versa.” ---Are you forgetting the Islamic takeover from its inception into the 1500s? North Africa and the Middle East used to be Christian. Spain, Southern France, the Balkans were subject to “imperial rule.” The Ottomans were the invaders, not the subjects. At some point, the past has to stop being used as an excuse for bad behavior. The Muslim Brotherhood is very recent, as is the militant philosophy of Sayyid Qutb, as is the Islamic Republic of Iran. Blaming everything on whitey falls flat too. There’s a reason no one wants the Muslim Brotherhood or the Palestinians around—the most devout Islamic lands are the most oppressive. Qatar might fund Islamist activity around the world but they don’t enforce it within their country. Afghanistan enforces it militantly and they’re the least happy country in the world. Just a couple examples of how the level of devout Islam correlates with the level of misery and oppression.

“The fact that all Jewish and Christian prophets after Moses eschewed political power may have helped encourage tolerance. But I'd reserve my suspicion for those who align with more specific groups. Examples: Al Qaeda, ISIS, the governments of the Persian Gulf states, Christian Nationalists, the KKK, Jews who support ethnic cleansing.” ---So you admit Christians and Jews are more tolerant than Muslims. Good, we’re making progress. Of those groups, how much carnage have Al Qaeda, ISIS, the Persian Gulf governments, and the Islamic Republic of Iran wrought, compared to Christian Nationalists (who are a minor, minor force within America), the KKK (down 1,000x from its peak), and Jews who support ethnic cleansing (small number within Israel, in fact a lot of devout Jews don’t support Israel because it wasn’t re-founded scripturally enough). There’s no comparison.

“If illegal immigration is all on the Democrats, what did Bush Jr. do to stop it?” ---We discussed this, it flipped around. In the last 10 years, Democrats have fought to expedite it while Republicans have fought it. It was never a good idea. Remember, Obama expressed alarm over less than half the level of illegal immigration that the “bipartisan” 2024 legislation would have allowed.

“The better analogy is, you go in the bank and say "I'd like to rob this bank if that's OK, no pressure". And the teller says "sure!" with a big smile and hands you a bag of money. And, if the police catch you, they just make you give back the money, and tell you "better luck next time bro!".” ---That’s quite a pained analogy. Illegal immigration is illegal. Being tempted by the promise is riches is no excuse. The fact that Democrats have fought enforcement of it, doesn’t make it less of a crime.

“I pointedly didn't opine on it. But whatever, it's clear your main goal here is just to feed your spite.” ---I want western civilization to have a backbone, a purely merit-based immigration system, the freedoms we have grown accustomed to, and the riches that freedom has brought us. That means only importing people who are in with the American program, regardless of race, skin color, or religion. Fact is, not everyone in America likes or respects us.

“Good character and qualities are the same regardless of gender. Only people lacking in good character and qualities don't understand that.” ---You used “very low T” as an insult, lest we forget.

@ThePuddyTat Thanks you've made my point. When you see a black man or meet someone who's Muslim, you should remind yourself that the increased risk is minuscule. That good character requires giving people the benefit of the doubt to a reasonable degree. Or, at least, that being a chicken shit in the face of a tiny risk is very low T. Think, don't emote.

So 1,000 years ago is out, but 1,500 years ago matters. I apologize for using big words like "ultimately". When you point out Muslim conquests in Europe, you have to admit that those areas were allowed to remain predominantly Christian. Can't claim the conquest matters, but the tolerance is too old to matter.

It's ironic that you say Islam is the worst because it's extremists have succeeded in committing more evil, but you vote to enable Christians and Jewish extremists to commit more evil. Really, get your head out of your ass, there's a Christian Nationalist in the Cabinet. Instability in Muslim countries has enabled their extremists to do more harm. Along with the West sending a raging river of money for oil, that the extremists had significant access to. When the West rejected nuclear power as too dangerous, it should have weighed in the danger of enabling Wahhabis to do evil with oil money.

Obama deported more people than Bush Jr., because the 2008 crash reduced the need for their labor. Both Bush and Obama used and discarded people deprived of full rights. It was very sketchy and senile for Biden to unilaterally open the border. But it may have helped keep inflation from being even worse than it was.

Thank you Sgt. Joe Friday for the rando manifesto on Western Civilization.

I don't know why you like the Sacramento Bee, when parody seems lost on you.

@ilbbaicnl “When you see a black man or meet someone who's Muslim, you should remind yourself that the increased risk is minuscule.” ---So you acknowledge there is an increased risk. I don’t cross the street whenever I see a black person or a Muslim, like a lot of the local libs here. But when one race comprises 13% of the population but accounts for 50% of the homicides, one must acknowledge there’s a problem with that culture. Really, it’s not all 13%, it’s black males 15-35, more like 2%. These are the facts of the case, and they are undisputed.

“So 1,000 years ago is out, but 1,500 years ago matters. I apologize for using big words like "ultimately". When you point out Muslim conquests in Europe, you have to admit that those areas were allowed to remain predominantly Christian. Can't claim the conquest matters, but the tolerance is too old to matter.” ---Apologize for your lack of reading comprehension. You can’t tell the difference between “1,000 years ago” and “from 1,500 years ago to the present day., continuously” Those areas “weren’t allowed to remain Christian,” they forcibly kicked the invaders out. From 1,500 years to the present day Islam has been spread by force.

“It's ironic that you say Islam is the worst because it's extremists have succeeded in committing more evil, but you vote to enable Christians and Jewish extremists to commit more evil.” ---No, I do not. No one is trying to foist Christian or Jewish or Shinto or Buddhist or Hindu or Taoist or Confucian law on America. You said I’m the paranoid one?

“Really, get your head out of your ass, there's a Christian Nationalist in the Cabinet.” ---Really? Are you fixated on a tattoo? How is he trying to force Christian tenets on America? You’re barfing back Democratic fever dreams. Be smarter.

“Instability in Muslim countries has enabled their extremists to do more harm. Along with the West sending a raging river of money for oil, that the extremists had significant access to. When the West rejected nuclear power as too dangerous, it should have weighed in the danger of enabling Wahhabis to do evil with oil money.” ---Is it our fault that they nurture extremists? It’s that oil money that Riyadh and Doha and Tehran use to finance jihadism. Believe me, I’m as pro-nuclear as anyone. And now we produce enough oil that we can tell the Middle East to go pound sand, and sort out their differences that they haven’t been able to for thousands of years. I would love that, you all sort out your differences, and if it spills onto American soil, we’ll turn the responsible nation into radioactive glass.

“Obama deported more people than Bush Jr., because the 2008 crash reduced the need for their labor. Both Bush and Obama used and discarded people deprived of full rights. It was very sketchy and senile for Biden to unilaterally open the border. But it may have helped keep inflation from being even worse than it was.” ---Biden generated inflation by his incremental spending on top of Trump’s, during a supply chain crisis, when his Secretary of Transportation was taking pictures in a hospital bed with kids he didn’t birth. We’re seeing that deportations of illegals are driving down housing demand and with it, prices. For years Dems have been saying we need to pay Americans enough to buy American goods. Illegal immigration undermines that.

“Thank you Sgt. Joe Friday for the rando manifesto on Western Civilization.” ---You said my goal was to “feed my spite.” So I showed you otherwise. I told you my goals, what are your goals, other than sacrificing America to show how enlightened you are?

@ThePuddyTat Are you perhaps a drug-slinging corner boy? In that case, it would make sense for you to be suspicious of black males 14-35. But corner boys should be nervous in general. I assume you are aware that bars are more dangerous than staying home, but you go anyway. If you want to be suspicious of black dudes and Muslims, but in no way act on it, I won't kink-shame that.

Spain and the Balkans were ruled by Muslims for centuries, but remained predominantly Christian. en.wikipedia.org

It's what the tattoo stands for. Asserting that sadistic killing and raping was somehow a positive for Western Civilization. If you think it was good, has to be presumed you want to do it again. It's no accident he was involved in pointlessly killing hundreds of innocent Iranians, in an ill-conceived war.

The West knows whatever non-extremists there are in those countries are unable and/or unwilling to prevent extremist access to the oil money. But we are fine with allowing the flow of money to continue. That's the West's fault. Generally government subsidies don't turn out to be worth it. But sabotaging green (or any) alternatives to oil that are market viable is borderline treasonous. Because reducing oil demand defunds ISIS, Hezbollah, Hamas and Al Qaeda.

@ilbbaicnl A drug-slinging corner boy, or an elderly victim of the knockout game in Queens, or a shopper in a mall when young black males start shooting at each other, or a spring breaker in Daytona Beach when they start breaking out into fights.

Actually I rarely drink and hate bars and clubs. Dangerous isn't a question. Not sure how any of this has to do with a kink, but maybe you're the one who's been drinking.

So a tattoo and not Hegseth's policy that makes you call him a Christian nationalist? The Crusades themselves were a counter to what Muslims were doing in the holy land. The Muslim armies weren't exactly Boy Sctus either. But I hope you have something better than a tattoo with which to call him a "Christian nationalist." Or are you calling Trump and the entire chain of command "Christian nationalists"? There's no rationale for "protecting Christians." The far more feasible explanation is that Trump got frisky after taking out Maduro and bit off more than he could chew. Trump is no one's idea of a devout Christian.

I'm all for reducing oil demand from the Middle East for that very reason. The greens are too chronically wrong for me to buy that we're baking the planet. That means we drill for as much in America (or other friendly countries) as we need. But the petro regimes, not just the ME but Russia, are the worst. Unfortunately, no alternatives are market viable. Wind and solar require tons of subsidies and cannot be used as baseload. Deep geothermal is promising but early. We're largely in agreement here.

@ThePuddyTat OK high T he man doesn't go to bars. Let's apply your "logic" in another case. In the US, on average, there are about 20 deaths from flying every year, and over 35,000 deaths from driving. So no reasonable person would ever drive it they could fly instead. It's totally irrelevant that people routinely drive hundreds of miles without dying.

If Hegseth had a swastika tattoo, would it be wrong to think he had Nazi sympathies? Did the Crusades result in lasting Christian control of Jerusalem? When the Crusaders sacked Constantinople, did that help prevent Muslim conquest of the Balkans? I mean, if the tattoo just means support for losing, counter-productive war, that would explain a lot about our current war with Iran. Repeating a previous link, so you can low T flee it again: en.wikipedia.org . He's clearly a dim bulb, so this by itself could be chalked up to cartoonish notions of history. But combined with his involvement in and support for war crimes, his treatment of women and non-whites as inferior to white men, and his opposition to constitutionally-mandated separation of religion and government, there's a preponderance of the evidence that he is the Christian counterpart of Osama Bin Laden.

Trump is going beyond stopping subsidies: apnews.com

@lotsoffun201 Jeez dude how about some finesse? A nicely seasoned plate of rice will shut up most Boricuas. And it contributes to the PAHG-ness.

@ilbbaicnl I think you're the gay one, bro.

@ThePuddyTat Oh you wish.

@ThePuddyTat Is this your hometown? en.wikipedia.org