ideas for differentiating strip club classes--or how to avoid the dreaded "Everyone gets 3.5 Stars"

I've been frustrated recently trying to communicate quality of clubs in my reviews, and I know I'm not the only one. It really sucks when you've been to very permissive clubs with very hot women and you're factoring those experiences into your scale, only to see your rating get lost among a ton of apparently inexperienced reviewers. I know that some have attempted to remedy this by propping reviews with "Club Ad," under the assumption the review is coming from the club itself. I myself had my first review criticized like this and I was quite offended. I'm trying to think of ways we can differentiate the truly great clubs from the average and poor.

I wanted to ask for ideas that we might have to differentiate clubs or tweak the rating algorithm, so we can avoid the dreaded state where everyone gets 3 or 3.5 stars and there's no differentiation between clubs. We already have a features section where we can list bikini bar, topless, or nude. Is there a prominent way that we could list that a club has a 6-foot rule, does air dances, is one-way touch, or two-way touch? I know that we wouldn't want to get clubs raided if we provide too much info, but if we list the most information that is publicly legal about the club we would automatically know a lot more about what a rating means. Undefeated at a Division I football team is a whole lot different from undefeated at a Division II football team. They're not in the same league. Likewise, how are bikini bars or air dance clubs getting above average reviews, like 4 stars overall? Who the heck is working there? Swimsuit models? Lingerie models? There's no way that's in the same league as a club where you can be hands-on legally.

My other idea was that we could tweak the rating algorithm so that those who have done reviews on more clubs (or more permissive clubs) could be weighted more heavily than those with less. I know this would be controversial, but I'm sure we could come up with some better way than accusing reviewers, often new enthusiasts to the site, of writing club ads. I am eagerly anticipating your feedback. Thank you.