Comments by Tetradon (page 5)

^ False, I used your exact language.

^ Yes, saying Biden took steps towards reducing the debt is either misleading or partisan. Anyone who conflates needed stimulus with profligate waste on vanity programs is either ignorant or dishonest.

""My vote against the debt limit increase cannot change the fact that we have incurred this debt already, and will no doubt incur more. It is a statement that I refuse to be associated with the policies that brought us to this point." Senator Joe Biden, 2006

"the biggest growth during GWB and the first steps of a reduction under Biden," Misleading. Trump needed to spend to keep the economy afloat in the early days of the pandemic. Biden continued to do so after it was no longer needed, and mostly shoveling more cash down the green money pit, and after we had already seen inflation.

"Why didn't Trump support the big cuts that are in the budget that McCarthy is tying to force Biden to accept?" I wasn't aware the Republicans were trying to engorge the IRS to go after Americans. Going after independent journalist Matt Taibbi on Christmas Eve when he didn't owe anything, I'm sure there's a good reason. Thank God one party is serving as the voice of spending restraint during a time of rapid inflation!

They're just as nervous and awkward about dating as men are. No woman is worth your self respect. Banging any woman, no matter how hot or skilled in the sack she is, will get routinr after a while.

At FKK Sharks in Germany, prices haven't changed since pre-pandemic (from reviews). Perhaps Austria is different. It seems like at most clubs, girls set their own prices, even above the "going rate."

Because Democrats are more concerned with "equity" than choosing the right person for the job. Oprah must love the feeling that Newsom is making her the token black woman.

I don't interview them before I get dances, but they run the gamut. Once they're socialized into club norms, there's less variation.

OnlyFans eats a bowl of dicks. There's already enough porn out there. I want ass in my crotch and tits in my face and possibly extras. Only fans can't provide me that.

^ Funny, they're fleeing blue states like Illinois and New York for Florida, hand over fist.

Fucking A I think I picked up a cold from a civvie hookup over the weekend. Timing works out. She was the mother of all bad decisions. Psychologically, makes me at my worst look stable and sane. Got kids who hate her. Smoker. Money cost was only a pizza and a bottle of wine, though, and at least I used protection. Ironically she was Romanian, and in America not at an FKK where I'm headed.

Adjudicators do not see who wrote the article. I've unknowingly shat on the reviews of people I like. It's not personal.

Anyone see Senator Rick Scott's travel advisory for socialists? No one who isn't already in the tank takes the NAACP, ACLU, or SPLC seriously anymore.

On one night? One girl? One session? One night - $750 at Sundowner and Seductions Niagara Falls, back in 2005 (so it might be more like $1,200 today). Tons of drinking, lap dances from assloads of hotties (barely left the room), and extras. I was working a well-paying but miserable job and spent accordingly. Still the most fun I've ever had clubbing, and cemented its place in my heart. One session - 600 Euros for a threesome with _all_ the extras (time, attention, services) at FKK Sharks. I wouldn't do it again. I learned from this that women are best enjoyed one at a time. The girls approached me as a unit but barely touched each other throughout the whole session. I felt hustled. One girl/session - Maybe $400 + room fee for FS? I know I'm a cheapskate, or as Icee might have said "a member of the bargain pussy collective." To which I reply, "guilty as charged." Like @rickdugan said on another thread, it's the principle of the thing--no matter how good the service was, it loses its luster if I shell out above the market rate or feel hustled. For $1,000 an hour, I'd either need to be horrendously desperate (like I'm wearing a chastity belt and she's got the only key) or I'd need full GFE, all holes, bare, with one of my favorite porn stars or actresses in her absolute prime. The better topic should be the least you've ever spent, or the best value you've ever gotten.

If I'm balls deep in one woman, it's hard for my attention to drift to another. But I've had a couple lovers that were so bad I thought "man, I wish I were jacking off right now."

^ #bait

@Papi, I'm a 4.5. I was an investment professional once, but it's been some time and I'm sure the game has changed since then. I don't fuck with retirement funds. Automated, fixed amount per month into target date funds. I don't think social security will be around, or paying nearly what it does now, when I hang it up. I put a little into the market every month but it isn't automated. Lately I've been more in safe/dividend stocks, but if I see a compelling individual stock, I'll draw down my savings account or move some stocks around. I have some deep sector expertise so I look for good plays there. Most people have no business playing individual stocks. They don't know how deep the Wall Street machine runs (legally and illegally). No one outside of a professional has any business day trading.

I got that once and it was such a turnoff. It's another way of saying "how can I get as much from you as possible while doing as little as possible." I should have said "$50 to cum in your ass."

^ Replacement theory isn't done Tucker Carlson thing, the left has been and continues to gloat about it. They might call it something euphemistic like "demographic transition" but it's the same exact thing.

^ He'd make a worthy addition to SJG and Icee on the "gone" list.

#bait

@25, "accredited investor" doesn't mean much. 200k a year salary or 1m in assets. (Numbers could be slightly different). Of course CJ just looking to troll.

With respect to OPs question, I say B. Interest rate movements have to walk the knife edge of recession and bank failures (though any chief risk officer who can't hedge interest rate risks need to be tarred and feathered) and inflation. I think that defaults to inertia. We don't have a wave of innovation set to create another tech bubble. Government spending is going to be constrained by debt service payments. I think any disruption is more likely to the downside than the upside though. On the debt ceiling, Republicans are surprisingly organized and coherent, not to mention they know the president takes a disproportionate fall for anything. Unemployment, a lagging indicator, may catch up to the others. That adds up to a stock picker's market. My retirement stuff is sacrosanct and stays in index funds. Sectors like tech that I don't know, I stay in ETFs. But where I do know something, I'm shopping for some smart bets. At one point I wanted to start a stock picker's thread, but I knew that anti-stock trolls like SJG would infest and hijack it.

^ Used to extort guilty white progressives and buy expensive real estate, that is.