Comments by LecherousMonk (page 10)

A girl from my school was rumored to be dancing at a redneck club shortly after graduation. This was in my pre-clubbing days, so I never verified, but I remembered her having a big rack, butterface.

What are you doing paying for services unrendered, or paying over market prices for services that were rendered, or getting drunk, and thereby impairing your judgment, at a strip club . . . wait, I just answered my own question.

Yeah, I thought the format was words, not syllables.

Tits aren't big. Everything else is good.

I still remember my discovery of TUSCL discussions. That was a long 18 hours of reading old posts and laughing my ass off.

BP is garbage. One of these things will almost certainly be the case: 1. It's not the girl in the pics 2. Pics are old and unrepresentative 3. She flakes on you One of these has a slight but not insignificant chance of happening: 1. LE sting (life ruined) 2. hold-up (life potentially ended) 3. STD (life fucked up)

Get a Tumblr account. There are lots of sugar babies on there, and lurking on their discussions is very illuminating because they're 100% honest with each other. I recall one post was specifically about good bullshit excuses for when you want more money out of your sugar daddy (just a richer version of a PL), and it was the typical shit: lost my phone, sick relative, car broke down, etc., etc., etc. It's all bullshit, all the time, and they have no qualms about it. We objectify their bodies, they objectify our wallets.

The full term is "soda pop." Why would you shorten that by removing the noun rather than the adjective? It makes no sense. The correct term is pop. Period.

Sure, one experience is worth two different prices to two different consumers, but consumers as a whole set the market rate. It's tuscl vs. stripperweb, pussy consumers vs. the pussy cartel. We're all in this together, and so if too many RICH STUDS start throwing too much money around because it's all the same to them, it hurts Joe Schmo PL. You hear a lot of public censure about this on a certain other forum where mongers share their BP experiences.

Mr. Deuce, I take exception.

Tl;dr Do you ever hear about a new strip club opening up? It's a NIMBY issue, and the only reason we still have the old clubs is because the restrictive zoning laws only target new clubs. Sex is the strongest human motivation, in a tie with food, and yet our society suppresses the expression of that desire, channeling it out of the public space and into cyberspace. It's not just cam girls that are drawing away custies, either. The ubiquity of (free) hardcore porn is very hard (heh) to compete with for males' attention. This affects not just strip clubs, but all facets of society, and is contributing to the phenomenon of young men "dropping out." Think about young women, too: they lost their religion, but they gained feminism, so having sex for money went from being taboo because it was a sin to being taboo because it was patriarchal exploitation. Either way, it's a tough psychological barrier for the smart, well-educated (both of which are highly correlated with good looks) ones to cross. I can't explain why, exactly, but despite all the rap videos and celebrity sex tapes, there is still deep sexual repression among even the younger generations in this country. Some of my friends growing up had the money and looks to have plenty of casual sex and a variety of sexual experiences, such as visiting strip clubs, but barely had any interest in playing the field. All of that was either gross or tacky to them--worth missing out on. Then there is the geography issue. If you live in the wrong jurisdiction, you're fucked. Or rather, not, because in many places between the Appalachians and the Rockies, the local vice squad takes its job very seriously, and is good at it. And nobody protests because who the hell wants to go on record as a whoremonger or some other breed of pervert? Finally, I'll just confirm the impression that dancer quality is bad. In most clubs, 7 is the ceiling, not the floor. And at the point, there is no point, as far as I'm concerned (which could just as well be said of this rambling post, but there you have it).

I don't use a numbers system: I visualize the sexual landscape as a Cartesian plane. The ones who aren't in reasonable shape don't warrant consideration. That weeds out the bottom 80% of women. Those remaining are plotted, with big tits / not big tits as the north/south axis and big ass / not big ass as the west/east axis. Also, I hate fake tits, so girls with implants go into the "no tits" category. This girl is in the southeast quadrant, in shape, but nothing else going for her--no thiccness.

BP is nothing but dregs anymore.

Also, forgot to mention I saw a dude with a gun (don't know he got that past security) that shot ones. He blew a wad of like 20-30 in like two seconds. On the one hand, I laughed at the novelty of it. After all, what's wrong with a little fun? Isn't that the point, after all? But, I couldn't help but notice how three minutes later no one remembered who had thrown (or shot) those bills.

This could be the title of a lecture. People show up expecting to hear about rain dancing traditions among the Great Plains Indians, but instead it's Juice's philosophical musings on the strip club scene. Lives would be changed.

^ Juice, your writings are becoming more cogent and better spelled, thereby losing some of their charm. Still funny, though. JS, I think you paid $500 for the bbbjcim because A) you have a lot invested in this dancer: you've been trying to wear her down for years; B) you are strangely forgiving: I would echo the sentiments of some of my fellow PL's that it is incongruent to tell a stripper off, and for good reason, but then let her sit on your lap a few minutes later, regardless of how hot she is; and C) if I recall correctly, you had a DS who was a drug addict, and whom you supported through multiple insincere recovery attempts, so you obviously didn't have a problem with creating a dependent relationship at that point. That's my take, but, hey, I could be wrong. Can't wait to find out, and keep the stories coming: it's good to have a few well-articulated, honest, and useful posts in between the "Rick Dugan is gay,"s, "check out this model,"s, political bullshit, sports bullshit, the continuing flame war of SJG vs. Mamisan and literally everyone else . . . and, of course, Lecherous Monk's whiny bullshit, too.

I'm taking the plunge.

Dominic, few of us can check all three of those boxes.

I'm sympathetic to anyone who is actually trafficked and to efforts to curtail trafficking, but I, however, doubt the notion, pushed by moralistic politicians, that almost all prostitutes are being trafficked.

I used to live on the Westside. 4Play is good, but crowded and expensive. I forget the names, but there were a couple in the neighborhood of Sepulveda that were pretty good.

If you were in a middle school health class in the last 15 years it is the notion that someone might not believe in orally spread STI's that would surprise you.

The naked-er the better

Nonexistent.

If everything is natural, which I highly doubt, 10/10.

Lol