Comments by Dougster (page 10)

@25: Sorry but I think it is you who lacks practical intelligence and lost alot of respect due to your defending @vincemichaels even after it was very clear that he had confessed to being a pedophile. You had no backbone on the issue. That does not earn respect. As for the spamming accomplishing nothing, apparently, LE is looking into the matter and requested TUSCL's database. This is a good thing, IMO, and shows we did accomplish something.

The fundamental problem seems to be that people are trying to blame the messenger for the fact that @vincemichaels is a self confessed pedophile. May they think if they delete the bad news, it changes the truth of the matter?

I think the point is if that a little board can't be governed according to a libertarian spirit, people are going to break down and start censoring when they get into a thorny situation, how on earth do you think a large country could be governed by libertarian principles?

They are reliving their trauma because they haven't realized yet, or don't want to realize, there is another way. It's partly about confirmation bias.

Seems Founder is okay with people threatening others with violence as @vincemichaels has done, and which @SJG guy is doing all the time. He's also okay with having self-admitted pedophiles on the board. However, Founder does draw the line at threads going after the self-admitted pedophiles. Really outstanding!

Yes, but we get to choose what we post about too, and Founder can decide if he wants to ban me or not. If I get banned for posting about @vinceygirl's self admissions of pedophilia that is fine. If it's board which is going to protect pedophiles by banning people who go after them: then fine might not be one I wish to participate in. Let's see what happens.

I notice you didn't answer my question, but I'll still answer yours: The reason I post to the entire board is that I do not want a self-admitted pedophile's existence on this board to be very comfortable for him.

Well lots not forget that the main target these days is a self-admitted pedophile. You have come to accept that your buddy (hopefully ex-buddy) is a pedophile by now, haven't you Papi?

Wait? Wait? You keep changing your story. First you wanted proof that I changed someone's mind about the System? Then when I present it, you said, no, no I wanted proof that I changed people's mind that he's a fag. Again, if you were here for the history of it, you would notice that opinions of his, absolutely degraded over time, and, yes, due to my reminding people of what he had said. Same with vinceygirl. @TFP: "The sex with the 14 year old is indeed, damning. But the quote you posted, not so much. He said who hasn't looked at a beautiful young woman. When I hear young woman, I think of an 18-20 year old woman " Dude, get a brain. Read what he wrote. He clarifies this himself, by saying it doesn't matter if he thought about it because he never molest "any" of them". (Contradicted by what DoctorPhil, not clubber, quoted later). Why is he talking about not "molesting" any of them if he is only refering to women 18-20? Again, you just aren't a person who comes to conclusions based on facts. You have a neat little narrative of the world you want to believe. You people you like: dugan, and clubber. And those you don't like: e.g. me and DoctorPhil. So when you "recall" thing you play back a narrative and fill in people you think are the good guys a scenario you want to believe is true. Good guy clubber did this. Good guy dugan did this but not until after good guy clubber did this. All these facts you are getting wrong should give you a hint that there is something majorly wrong with your mode of thinking. But that's just the way it is with dumb people like you. tl;dr you are a real dummy

Very disappointed in Founder trying to bail out @vincemichaels instead of doing the right and ethical thing.

And, sorry, here is the correct link to a "woman is a woman regardless of her age": https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=54027

It's just demonstrably true. @vinceygirl did not crack until it was the relentless pressure from (mostly) txtittyfag, but me and vincemichels as well which caused him to say "a woman is a woman regardless of her age". And if you had actually read the thread you would see it was exactly in the context of discussing underage girls. (Again looking at actually facts don't seem to matter to you: you already have your erroneous conclusion reached.) Here's let me help your little pea-brain. Here's the the thread https://www.tuscl.net/?page=post&id=53542 Here is the exact context: vm: "And who here doesn't like looking at beautiful young women ? You are a stupid asshole, Douchester. I don't doubt for a moment you have looked at a young women or a hundred of them and wanted part of them. It's what you do about it that counts and I've never molested any of them. Can everyone here say the same ??? I doubt that. Not trying to insult those of us with restraint" tiifyfag: And who here doesn't like looking at beautiful young women ? ^^^^^^ ROFLMAO @ dat BS! 13yeer oldz aint yung womenz u DUMBAZZ #PEDO! txtittyfag November 29, 2017 13yeer oldz b kidz! U COMPRENDE U DUMBAZZ PEDO vm: "You are an idiot. A woman is a woman no matter what age they are, what a stupid POS you are, fag. Lick my asscrack. LMAO" And who do you think made fun of RickBoy's The System in the first place and won't let them forget? Again you know nothing of the history of this place. You have decided conclusions you wish were true, which fit in your little erroneous narrative of the world, but don't look at what the facts actually say. tl;dr you are a real dummy

Epic failure for Libertarianism. Say hello... to the nanny state!

@TFP Also it's just factually wrong that RickDugan wasn't disgusted by vinceygirl before "Clubber's quote" (actually DoctorPhil) he spoke out about @vinceygirl s pedophilia long before, as early as when @vinceygirl started complaining about the end of teenage swimsuit competitions. @rickdugan also made fun of vince's lying about military service. So much of what you say is just plain factually incorrect. You have decided the conclusion you want to arrive at, and ignore all facts that show that it is wrong, and then you just pull thing you would like to be true, but are provable false (rickdugan's long time stance) out of thin air and present them as fact. tl;dr: you are a real dummy

@TFP: what are you talking about? It was DoctorPhil who put the final nail in the coffin for @vinceygirl. Why are thinking it was clubber? And plenty of people were disgusted with him long before that. That just picked up the remaining people who were convinceable. Another big moment was when he said "a woman is a woman regardless of her again". And, yes, it was the relentless by txtittyfag including the spam you are complaining about that finally got him to crack on that one. I don't think you were around the board long enough to know the impact my campaign against RickDugan had against perspectives against him. It definitely changed them. You are just saying a bunch of stuff you wish were true, "spamming and prolonged campaigns never helped!" but is provable untrue given the evidence. It's definitely had a big impact against both Dugan and @vinceygirl, although it turns out that @vinceygirl is by far the bigger problem. Sorry, but you just like to pretend you speak on behalf of the entire board when you uses phrases like "nobody and no one" when you are not speaking for everyone. You wish you were but it's just not true.

Epic failure for Libertarianism. Say hello... to the nanny state!

Oh is that what is when people say they are disgusted by you and your self-admitted pedophilia? Just whining? Okay, got it. In your Neanderthal mind you have none nothing wrong. The problem is with the whiners. Got it!

Says that @vinceygirl who has also said "just because I lied about military service doesn't mean I lied about military service" and "just because I admit to being attracted to underage girls and have admitted to having sex with at least one of them doesn't mean I'm a pedophile". Yep, real smart one you are, vinceygirl!

TFP: "Which replies? You mean the ones where people are disgusted by pedophiles?" TFP: "So which replies are you talking about?" This is hilarious. In the first sentence, you are like "well, yeah, I guess there are replies". Then in the last sentence you are like "there aren't any replies". Have a little trouble keeping your story straight even across the space of one post, TFP? Just how much of a pea-brain are you? LOL!

TFP: " Dougster those millions of threads you start with the same topic? No one reads them, we just scroll right past." Nobody? Incorrect based on the replies I see. Again you pretend like you are speaking for the entire board when you are not.

Both faggots. One's also a pedophile and the other a (third rate) lawyer. LOL!

To the moon!

Scared to think of what @vincemichaels real answer to this would be.

Why did you short it?

Lol!