Comments by Dougster (page 8)

@25: you absolutely are defending him. You are saying there is not enough evidence to reach the conclusion that he is a pedophile. This despite the fact that he has, on many occasions, admitted to being attracted to underage girls, and that he has admitted to have sex with at least one of them on his sailboat. Spin it, @25, spin it! Keeping look like the fool that you are!

@25 LOSES AGAIN! LOL!

@25: right. So if someone working for you told you some BS which you knew was BS but you couldn't prove it in a court of law or "with scientific evidence", it would all be good, right? You won't call them out on it? You'd just be like, well I only have an option, so I'll hold back. That's really your standard? As I asked you in another thread: Tell the truth much? You are the one making a fool of yourself, by letting your friendship @vinceygirl blind you from seeing what he really is: a pedophile.

Sorry, but when someone admits to being attracted to underage girls on many occasions and then admits to having sex with at least one of them they ARE a pedophile. It is no matter of opinion. It's that simple. Really!

Wait, wait... rickdugan is one of my aliases? Now that is one I have not heard before. Let me guess your reasoning: There is no way anyone in the world would attack my totally reasonable defense of a pedophile. Unless it's that unreasonable guy Dougster. So if Dougster and dugan both attacked me they must be the same person. So rickdugan must be one of Dougster's aliases! That is truly brilliant. And big difference between txtittyfag and txtittyfag(dot). There's plenty of you asking me for my help in there "what are you thoughts on..." "tell me if anything comes up and you get out". I'd be surprised if there is anything the other way. If there is it was just me trying to be nice. Ratio might be 10:1, although even that would surprise me. And, you'll post anything in public? Cool... Post how the prices and times you bought and sold cryptocurrencies are so wildly different (and less favorable) in what you told me versus what you told the board? Hey, I know you pretend the standard is "unless you can prove it in a court of law" and you did scramble to come up with some BS explanations when I called you out on it, but let's just say it all extremely suspicious. Tell the truth much, @25? LOL!

@25: Have a look above. I see @Papi being the first to take a few shots at me here. I'm responding in kind. Not picking a fight. And, no, I don't GAF if some is a "long term member" and has "posted intelligently" in the past. That gives you no free pass to defend a self-admitted pedophile. I'll call out on it no matter who you think you are and what you think your credentials are. Truth is the truth. Nobody gets a free pass around it. Sorry!

I think @Papi deserves a naivety award for desperately grasping at straws that his buddy @vincemichaels is not really a pedophile. (Hey, @Papi, are with the crowd who is like he has brain defects and is only doing it get attention?)

Wow! You predicted I would call you for defending a pedophile because you defended a pedophile? That is truly amazing. Too bad you aren't as good at predicting the markets (which is why you were always PM'ing me for help). And, no, I am not going to let you easily live that one down. LOL!

Yep, have to agree with @SJG there. Geoffrey Miller is calling it: "The most important lawsuit in modern American history" That may be stretching it a bit, but not that much.

Only one explanation of why @25 is willing to defend @vincemichaels even though the latter is a self-admitted pedophile: They are homosexual lovers! LOL!

@25: you still pissed that you got called out for defending a self-admitted pedophile? Just admit you were wrong, stop doing it, and all will be good. It's that simple. Really.

Oh? So you admit you're not very good. That's good and something we all knew anyway. Like I say: you keep being skeptical of crypto-currencies and being wrong. I'll keep investing in them and being right and raking in the money. I'm sure it will be like the stock market with you though: no matter how long you are wrong for you'll be convinced that some time, probably just around the corner, it's gonna crash and prove you right.

Buy! Buy! Buy!

@skibum609: One little problem, though. I've given those examples in other threads. Now I thought a guy like you (a lawyer supposedly) would actually do your research, but I guess any expectations of you is too much. Examples I've given in other threads: taking power away from the big banks and giving it to people (why I've said I personally would prefer not invest in establishment coins like Ripple and why I hope it does not win). Another thing I've cited before, the big one for me, is that many of these coins support community voting. Another thing I've cited is how they lower transactions fees which is very important to people in poor countries. Especially Africa. How some of the coins allow people with very little computing power, maybe only a Raspberry Pi to get on board. I've also cited how they speed transactions. So, yeah, good idea if you actually check what you say before leveling your baseless accusations. It's all there. Just let me know if you are too lazy/dishonest to look it up and I'll get the links from you. As for observations from being a lawyer, you've indicate a number of times how good a lawyer are. Starting with that shitty third rate law school you attended.

@Bj99: "Well, he did make up serving in the military just to win a point w you." Well, I certainly didn't say I thought he was honest. He did say in one post that he "never" molested "any" underage girls. That was later contradicted when DoctorPhil pulled up the sailboat post. So lying about something which is almost universally seen as positive, military service, is consistent with him trying to build a good image of himself and win friends in real life. Indeed, he does seem good at making friends in real life providing he hides his pedophilia. But I think it bothers him that he makes these friends by fooling them. He wants his real self, pedophilia, and all to be accepted. So he rationalizes that everyone is attracted to underage girls, and that he is the only one willing to admit it. Or, he thinks, every guy has sex with an underage from time to time. It's no big deal. And, besides, he remained "friends" with her afterward??? How bad could it have been. (Wonder how much the thought of some 50/60 y/o guy being "friends" with a 14 y/o and inviting her onto his sailboat creeps everyone out?) I do agree with you, though, that he is very likely mentally disabled. But I don't think it's to the point where he can't differentiate right from wrong, so don't think it would give him much of a legal defense.

@Bj99: Yeah, I'm not buying this trolling for attention crap. @vincemichaels, above all, is on the board to build a positive image of himself and make friends IRL. Admitting to being a pedophile just does not fit into that. I think you're idea that @vincemichaels suffers from some kind of brain damage or has some kind of genetic deformity affecting his mind is quite likely, but I still won't buy "he is so dumb he didn't know what he was saying (on multiple occasions)". He very likely is so dumb he didn't know what the reception to what he said would be, but not so he dumb he was making it up in direct opposition to his primary goals for being on the board.

What's a "cuckservative"?

If you want to date a stripper w/o paying it's the same strategy as OTC: you just ask. No faggity little System required. No whether it's going to work for you or not depends mainly on whether you are a RICH STUD like me, or just a DUMB FAG. If the former, you have a good chance, if the latter, be prepared for rejection and then to go back to dipping into your wallet for cash.

Bro, this is ridiculous.

Cry like a baby when busted for defending a self-admitted pedophile: @25

1x week is too little.

100 meter dash award: @25.

Big bank support is a negative for me: at least from the perspective of me investing in line with my ideals. For a purely investment POV, however, hard to argue it is not a plus and the big rally sure seems to support that. I would be disappointed, however, if, after all the effort people put into decentralization the market voted on a centralized solution as its favorite. In the end, though, if that is the will of people so be it! I too would jump on the train at that point if it's clear it's going to be the winner. Still early in the race, however, IMO.

skibum609: "I am cheering for every investor to lose everything and do a 1929 off a building" And you say there is something really wrong with me.