Comments by Richard_Head (page 11)

Horrific story like this and your only response is to take pot shots at me? Yep, that makes you an asshole. Own it.

^^^ Left and right have lots of connections to Jeffrey Epstein.

You know what I meant asshole, your turning it into something that it isn’t says a lot about your character, or lack there of.

I’m perplexed by why some on this site don’t want this story to come to light so that those responsible are held to account. Is it hitting to close for comfort for you?

^^^ Are you an asshole about everything.

It will be fascinating if anyone can ever connect all of the dots of this story.

Solid 8

I see the conservative circle jerk is still going strong in the Discussion boards. Tucker Carlson is as racist as that head writer he just fired, he has no credibility whatsoever.

She's a solid 7.

I would guess that it's better to have past racist ties, than current racist ties.

Ducey just extended the order on bars until further notice. It sounds like they will re-evaluate every couple of weeks.

Only on TUSCL can you find ‘conservatives’ talking down 18.6 million jobs created, solid wage growth, GDP growth and a budget surplus. Slap Bush or Trump name on that and you clowns would be cumming in your pants. Enjoy your 40 million unemployed and record deficit morons.

Got to be Halsey. https://youtu.be/8nBFqZppIF0

The Mayo Clinic is jumping on the “we may be closer to herd immunity than previous thought” bandwagon. https://www.kare11.com/article/news/health/coronavirus/do-some-people-have-preexisting-immunity-to-the-coronavirus/89-b01b53a7-2663-4854-9a59-342d9c2dc6d6

Give the man his due mark, jobs, GDP, wages and the stock market all performed quite well all 8 years of the Clinton Presidency. http://politicsthatwork.com/economic-record-president/clinton

Clinton also created 18.6 million jobs and left with a budget surplus.

So it was Newt, not Bill Clinton who raised taxes on the wealthy and thus stimulated the economy, I had no idea. Thanks for the refresher guys.

Thanks for sharing, glad you are okay. Did you have any pre-conditions?

Hell, I’d vote for Mr_O over Trump in a heartbeat too.

Perhaps you should do some reading on FANNIE and FREDDIE yourself. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/12/for-the-last-time-fannie-and-freddie-didnt-cause-the-housing-crisis/250121/ https://slate.com/business/2008/10/the-right-blames-the-credit-crisis-on-poor-minority-homeowners-this-is-not-merely-offensive-but-entirely-wrong.html

Trump has been the most divisive President in my lifetime, time to move on.

Anarchy is happening under Trump’s watch asshole, why do you support that?

That is some revisionist history there pistola, now I see why Trump loves the under educated. Here's how I recall it. Clinton raised taxes on the wealthy, invested heavily in innovation, created 18.6 million jobs and left office with a budget surplus. GWB then took over, cut taxes on the wealthy, bungled us into Iraq, bungled the housing market, exploded the deficit and left us in the worst recession since the great depression. Obama then took over, unemployment dropped and the stock market tripled despite an obstructionist congress. Trump took over and then road Obama's coattails for several years before completely bumbling the pandemic and we now have about 40 million unemployed Americans. And for the record the CRA passed in 1977 (under Jimmy Carter), if it was such bad policy it would have crashed the economy long before the housing market crash in 2008. The housing market crashed due to deregulation and the subprime mortgage crash that resulted. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/feb/06/donald-trump/no-economy-didnt-suddenly-get-strong-under-donald-/

Weird that you say that papi because historically the economy performs much better under Democratic Presidents. https://www.thedailybeast.com/everyone-does-better-when-the-presidents-a-democrat

No papi, I’m a supporter of Biden and Democracy. You on the other hand seem to favor some sort of fascist regime that has no checks and balances.